Hi Steffan,
I have attached another SAT trace of /SAPTRX/EH_AUTHR. Let me know if you get a chance to look at the issue.
Regards
GGOPII
Hi Steffan,
I have attached another SAT trace of /SAPTRX/EH_AUTHR. Let me know if you get a chance to look at the issue.
Regards
GGOPII
Hi All ,
Any input ?
Regards.,
Shiva
Best would be to follow SAP Note 669848 - Unlocking the Administrator User on the J2EE Engine/AS Java
Good luck !!
Can you plz guide me?
Hi,
Suggest you to follow SAP docs at One Web Dispatcher, Two Systems: Configuration Example - SAP Web Dispatcher - SAP Library
& SAP Web Dispatcher Configuration Reference - User Interface Add-On for SAP NetWeaver - SAP Library
Regards,
Could you please share the customization setting (screenshot)of movement type 101
Hi Ravi,
I have tried with BADI BADI CRM_ORGMAN_BADI. And in all the 5 methods i have set external break point and executed web client. While creation of service order after entering service request number none of the above mentioned method is getting trigger. After entering service request number only i have to do auto fill. I observed that method CRM_ORGMAN_DETERM_INITIAL is getting trigger at initial level but that time i will not have service request number.
Hi all,
I have a requirement to make some field like xref2 substitution when I make up a parked document via F-63. I am aware that regular OBBH substitution is not available for parked docs. So the question is do anyone could suggest any standard solution\enhancments? I've already tried few of them like BTE - 00001030 & BADI - AC_DOCUMENT both CHANGE_INITIAL & CHANGE_AFTER_CHECK methods and got no good. So I would appreciate any suggestion.
Thanks,
Tim.
We have following requirement -
Whenever an order is created, even though stock exists, it should not confirm it right away. We need the delivery date to be current date + 7 days.
This will help us avoid new orders consuming the stock.
For example:
Order 1 created; There was no stock; Hence no confirmation
Order 2 created; There was no stock; Hence no confirmation
Order 3 created; There is stock; At this stage, the order quantity should not be confirmed even though there is stock since there are 2 old orders waiting.
Therefore whenever an order created, delivery date should be in future so that older orders get first preference when stock is available. This is material specific i.e., for some it might be 7 days and for few it might be 10 days.
We either want the delivery date to be a future date or the order quantity should not be confirmed even though there is stock.
We saw that there is lead time in the sales order type customizing, but this will be applicable to all the materials which is not what we want.
Is there any way we can achieve this by just customization and not use user exits.
Hi,
I have setup immediate TO creation for all stock status posting changes in WM. The pre requisite is the whole batch to be included in MB1B. It works fine.
While creating a TO for the Posting change notice in WM, the stock in interim storage types (902,916) is available for selection in the LT05 screen when the whole batch is not selected. I would want to stop the system from proposing the interim storage types; at the same time the immediate TO creation should work for all other physical s.types. I have tried the following:
1. All interim s.types checked for exclusion from stringent FIFO
2. Created a search strategy for removal A, ref, WM mvt. with S type search *** (stringent fifo)
Result:
Say 10 EA of batch 040412 in Q status - 902 s.type and 10 EA of batch 040412 in Q status in Highrack (001 s.type), first the immediate TO is not created if MB1B - 321 mvt is done for 20 EA immediate TO is created for both 902 and 001.Secondly, if MB1B is done for 10 EA, it proposes both 902 and 001 for selection but the TO errors out if 902 is selected and works fine for 001.I understand the system needs to know which 10 to select, but I dont want the 10 in 902 to be considered at all. Hence, when MB1B is done for 10EA and if they are found in 001 s.type, immediate TO should be created. All the stock apart from interim should be considered by the system for immediate TO creation.
I wanted to know :
1. Is it possible to stop the interim s.types from being proposed in LT05. If yes, how ?
2. With the solution to 1 above, will it still allow me to create immediate TOs if MB1B is done for the complete batch of material.
Thanks.
HI ROB,
SELECT-OPTIONS : s_werks FOR marc-werks
What is the business driver behind such a requirement?
Regards,
Vivek
Hi Michael,
I am able to hide the Activity type for my data entry profile.
This can only be done in CAC2 - Double click data entry profile - click influences, see whether there is any field is hidden.
Regards
Terence
Hello,
could you please provide the detailed info of invoke_db2sap.sql to us, please also check the detailed
info in sapinst_dev.log to see which user is used before the following statement was run:
db2 -tvf invoke_db2sap.sql -r invoke_db2sap.res -z invoke_db2sap.out
Thank you very much.
Regards
Alfred
Hello Kazim,
I would love to chat with you about this further. InEight Inc. has solutions that can meet the needs that you have mentioned. We are an SAP OEM partner, and have recently won two SAP awards in 2015. You can find more information on our website. You can get in contact by submitting one of the many contact forms on our website.
Thank you,
Angela
More info:
InEight is a technology company dedicated to helping owners, EPCMs and contractors improve cost certainty, visibility and operational control of capital projects across the heavy construction, utilities, infrastructure, industrial, oil and gas and mining industries. The InEight suite of solutions empowers companies to estimate, control and connect all aspects of their capital and maintenance projects, from the back office to the jobsite, across the project lifecycle – Planning, Estimating, Execution, Control, and Turnover. InEight was awarded 2015 SAP® Pinnacle Award, OEM Partner of the Year. Attached press release was distributed North America.
http://www2.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=1188578
Hi Trivedi,
HANA SP9 Rev 91
Regards
Deeru
Hi Adam,
I dont think copying a project from different controlling will work. You need to create a Standard Template and copy it, this should work.
Regards
Terence
Dear Bowen,
Thanks for your Prompt & Exact solution.
Error is disappear now.
Thanks & Regards
Mitesh Rajapkar
1) in standard we don't have provision to drill down at lower lever to perform the confirmation you can define only at movement type level hence you need to write your own custom logic ask your development team to have a look on the function module L_TO_CONFIRM / L_TO_CONFIRM_SU
2) Storage type 901 is for receipt from production and for this WM movement type 103 is mapped against IM movement type 101 check your configuration for that
Senario :In Webi 4.1 Report We have input control on column Space 1,Space 2,Space 3,Item | ||||
we have Space 1,Space 2,Space 3,Item as dimension and Measure as quantity value | ||||
measure value is fixed on Space 1,Space2,Space3 | ||||
I need the sum on changing the value of input control Space 1,Space 2,Space 3 in permutation but not on Item | ||||
Measure doesnot depend on item |
Space1 | Space2 | Space3 | Item | Measure |
A1 | B1 | C1 | D1 | 2 |
A1 | B1 | C1 | D2 | 2 |
A1 | B1 | C2 | D3 | 3 |
A1 | B1 | C2 | D4 | 3 |
A1 | B2 | C1 | D5 | 4 |
A1 | B2 | C1 | D6 | 4 |
A2 | B1 | C1 | D7 | 6 |
A2 | B1 | C1 | D8 | 6 |
result : on selection of input control | |||
Space1 | Space2 | Space3 | sum |
A1 | B1 | C1 | 2 |
A1 | B1 | All | 5 |
A2 | All | All | 6 |
All | All | All | 15 |