Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all 8902 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Odata Service Error

$
0
0

Hi Uday,

You can check the reason of error via the Error log.

For the Error log you need to go to transaction  /IWFND/MAINT_SERVICE. then select your service and click on "Error Log" button. A new Error log screen will open with Error log.

 

 

Regards,

Atanu


Re: Transport Transformation inactive

$
0
0

Hi Joy,

You are not able to activate the transformation in development itself?

Then, you go for collect datasource, cube into 1 tr# and transformtion and DTP in to 2 tr#.

retransport them.

 

I think you error says not follows order?

 

Thanks,

Ram

Re: where and Which the temporary Held and Parking documents are stored in which table?

$
0
0

Once you decide on the table , you can either use SELECT statement if you want to retrieve the values without knowing the primary parameter else you can use GETTAB command.

 

Thanks,

Aj

Re: Usability: Authorization form improvement

$
0
0

Yes, improvement can be done in this area.

Assuming an SCN ticket gets created on this topic, it is not clear when idea would be implemented.

 

Meanwhile, you can choose 'Remember me', and thereafter every time you try to 'Log in', login would take place automatically till you wipe out the browser cookies.

Re: Adobe Forms in PDF released by SAP

$
0
0

Thread locked. Please read the Rules of Engagement before posting again.

 

Do not ask for documents, links or other materials.

Re: In sap script i am getting same value two times?

$
0
0

Debug and check your what data your internal table passing to the Script.. 

Re: Adobe Forms in PDF released by SAP

$
0
0

I wonder why you answer your own posts?

Re: Credit Mgt.

$
0
0

Hi Saurav,

Message not OK means document is not OKwith the dynamic credit check and the odest open items credit check. It means document has exceeded dynamic credit check limit which is given to payer customer and same is the case for the oldest open items credit check.Hence the document you are checking is blocked for credit. If you check the sales order in the header credit status will be not approved means document is blocked for credit.

 

Further the the payer customer what system had analyzed in CHECK_CM report (First screen shot 100547) is different from the FD32 screenshot what you have attached (second screen shot  101728).

 

Please check the 100547 customer for ZKAL credit control area in FD32 screen which will give you the details of the credit limits used.


Re: Checking wether a scenario exists in solar01 or not

$
0
0

Automating the tress structure is not ideal as when the structure changes the script fails.

If you still want to automate it using GETGUI is one option.

 

Automating using the Search/Find option and searching for the desired secnario in Solar01.

 

Thanks,

Aj

Re: MAP is not getting updated after GR is done against STO

$
0
0

I have some difficulties to read this, screenshots would be really better.

 

in your last response you listed for example

490000001331.01.20135616818897136482.8Project

 

a few hours earlier the same material document was listed as:

1102 561 Q       4900000013  898 31.01.2013                1  NO

1102 561 Q       4900000013  899 31.01.2013                1  NO

1102 561 Q       4900000013  900 31.01.2013                1  NO

1102 561 Q       4900000013  901 31.01.2013                1  NO

1102 561 Q       4900000013  902 31.01.2013                1  NO

1102 561 Q       4900000013  903 31.01.2013                1  NO

 

The big difference between those 2 is not that you totaled 6 items, for me the big difference is that you have a Q for project stock in the single lines, while your total has no Q.

This is just an example that makes it really difficult to trust any number and to recalculate what really happened.

 

project Q stock is valuated in a special stock table, while normal valuated stock is visible in account view of material master which represents the MBEW table.

 

so you would at least need to take this apart from each other to really know the development of own valuated stock .

 

You started with the 351 movement in receiving plant.

I can see that 136482.83 was posted and that you listed a balance with 272965.83

but a single number cannot tell anything about development.

if you would start this report in January, then you could probably see the development.

Re: CO02 Component overview change

$
0
0

For purchasing data tab to open you need to maintain external operation data and/or subcontracting data in routing.

 

For variable size item data you need to maintain it in BOM.

 

If you maintain the above data then you can open the tabs in production order (CO02).

Re: Withholding Tax Limit Issue

Re: How to update Multiple Confirmation thorugh 855 ORDRSP / ORDERS05

$
0
0

Hi Palani,

 

System always updates the same confirmation category upon receiving the Order Acknowledgement through EDI and that confirmation category is derived from the internal confirmation category (1-Order Acknowledgement) in the settings IMG->MM->Purchasing->Confirmations->Define Internal Conf Categories.

 

However in your case, whenever you receive the order acknowledgement in 3 different stages, the data which you are passing in the IDoc will be updated except the Order Acknowledgement which will be replaced with AB in your case.

 

Please check the below info from SAP help

 

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/1c/deffb0844f11d2b471006094b9476a/content.htm

Updating of PO When Several Partial Acknowledgments are Received

 

An order acknowledgment always relates to a PO item and not to individual schedule lines.

 

If a vendor initially sends a partial acknowledgment relating to only two schedule lines of an item with three schedule lines, you will expect further acknowledgments.


As soon as a further partial acknowledgment is received via EDI, "all old acknowledgments recorded manually or via EDI" are deleted. All old data is replaced by the data of the current acknowledgment.

 

Regards,

Asik.

Re: [AFP] AFPisLoaded event never raised. L-Shape API problem (undefined)

$
0
0

Hi Daniel,

 

So your starting point was the AJAX Framework Masthead iView or the classic framework page Masthead iView? I'd suggest that you copy the standard SAP AFP and then add your own masthead iView into that copy.

 

Then the next thing I would do is use the developer tools in IE or Chrome or Firefox to debug the page loading and see what is going on.

 

Hth,

Simon

Re: RFC structure issue

$
0
0

Hi Bhargava,

 

Please make few checks:

The destination (TCP IP connection) for making this RFC call is working in ECC (SM59). The program ID registered in ECC should be used in the PI RFC sender communication channel and the channel activated.

Check if commit work has been done in the RFC you are using.

Do some dummy changes in RFC adapter and activate it once.

Go through the below link and work with your basis team:

http://howtosap.blogspot.ca/2011/03/create-rfc-tcpip-connection-and.html

 

seems like a problem with the gateway.

 

Hope it helps!

Ambrish


Re: ChaRM: Non SAP apps

$
0
0

Thanks Jansi.

 

Yes I'll well are of CTS+ and upgrading to 7.1

 

When I read "Non-SAP" I was thinking of platforms like Sharepoint.  I was just going to use Administration transaction type to manage these changes.  I think that's probably the best way.

 

Cheers

Re: ChaRM - 4 tier

$
0
0

Hi Jansi

 

Thanks for your reply.  I fully understand how TOCs work and I know they never progress to PRD.

 

Are you saying you ONLY test TOC and don't retest the original transport after it's released?

 

As per SAP documentation, the process is outlined as follows:

 

TOCs: Unit Test in QA

Original Transport (after TOC has been successfully tested): Scenario Test in QA

 

What happens if the scenario test fails?

 

Are you saying all testing should occur against the TOC and no testing occurs against the transport which will eventually go to PROD?

 

Thanks

Shaun

Re: CRMD_ORDER does not show all transaction types.. :(

$
0
0

If you maintained channel for any one transaction, then you have to maintain the channel of all transactions you want to show.

 

if you want to simply show all transaction types, just don't maintain any of them.

 

cheers

Eric

Re: Function Group Does Not Exist but not allowed to create

$
0
0

Hi Michael

 

Out of interest... what value does your TADIR entry have in the "Deleted" (fieldname: DELFLAG) column? Hopefully it is set to true ('X').

 

Have you tried debugging the creation process as I suggested earlier?

 

Regards

Glen

Re: Need help in mapping logic ...!!!

$
0
0

Hi Aziz,

 

You can use a mix of standard function and a small UDF to arrive at the logic. Something like below:

 

For Input date(Begda) in my screenshot, you can use the date field from source (delivery date). this can be in any format but make sure you change the source field date format in standard Date functions, DateAfter or DateBefore.

 

Instead of add Function above, you have to create a UDF which would add certain days to the current date.

Use calendar class and standard cal.add(Calendar.DATE, days); where days is the number of days.

If you need further help with the UDF, please let me know.

 

It was not clear from your post on what you plan to populate if the above condition is met so I have left it here. You can build your logic on top of the logic above.

 

Hope it helps!

Ambrish

 

Message was edited by: Ambrish Mishra

Viewing all 8902 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images