Hello Daniel,
there is no direct integrated support. Did you check Handling of SELECT-OPTIONS parameters within AMDP already?
Regards,
Florian
Hello Daniel,
there is no direct integrated support. Did you check Handling of SELECT-OPTIONS parameters within AMDP already?
Regards,
Florian
so for the two systems DEV and TEST, what is the path moving the code? Do I have to download into local ATL file and upload?
Getting closer! At least this time I received 'no data to retrieve' and not a data error. Note, though, that I don't know what you are referring to about the Reference table as your image is not showing and when I try to look at it it says the page doesn't exist.
Julius von dem Bussche wrote:
Where a "cross pollination" of objects would happen is create authorizations for CR + DR in 1000 and create authorizations for OR in 2000 and in both cases VA01 is used -> the user would be able to create OR in 1000 as well.
OK, I see what you mean now. That would be a very strange setup though since these document types usually correspond to different roles in real life.
I do agree that it would've made more sense to have just one object here. I don't think these objects are even used anywhere separately. Don't really see in what business context the document type check would be sufficient...
Ola,
Vejo duas alternativas:
1) Criar um campo de usuario para informar este outro vendedor. É alterar os relatorios para constar este campo.
2) Se não forem muitas combinações de vendedores criar codigos para vendedores compartilhados do tipo:
10 - Joao e Maria
11 - Joao e Jorge
Boa sorte,
Jean
Hi Li,
I don't know it is possible to control internally in proxy TrackedProcessEventNotificationCreateRequest_In, because I could see his class /SAPTRX/CL_TPEN_REQUEST_IMPL -> EXECUTE -> lo_confirmation_proxy calls confirmation proxy inside.
Regards
GGOPII
Boa Tarde, Lucia:
Aqui até tentamos juntamente com o pessoal do Fiscal colocar a indIEdest = 2, mas a nota rejeitou com o código 790 (operação com exterior para destinatário contribuinte).
Acordamos com eles e utilizaremos também o indFinal = 1 até a SEFAZ se pronunciar se teremos outro indIEdest para exportação ou se vão checar também a UF antes de rejeitar com o 696.
--EDIT--
Luciany,
Acho que acabaram de publicar, pois olhamos ontem e não estava lá...kkkkkkk
http://www.nfe.fazenda.gov.br/portal/exibirArquivo.aspx?conteudo=xn8MdJp 4F8=
Agora é só aguardar o pessoal da SEFAZ RS corrigir a validação mesmo.
Abraços,
Vinícius
When I tried to do phrase merge by selecting 100ks of phrases , the system gave me dump message . What is the best way to do merge at once when you have huge data . Also while merging there is option to do check mark for OT and there is no button to select at once this OT field for all phrases to merge . Do I have to click this box 1000 times or is there any easy way to handle this ?
Regards,
K G
As these are only Community Forums, to "pass this up the line", you will have to create a phone incident;
Crystal Single Case Technical Support - SAP Business Objects US Online Store | SAP Online Store
- Ludek
I believe I'm getting no data because this prompt has to be a number and not a string. I don't know what I could use a numeric value in place of Null, but even the query preview is showing no results.
Hi NewB,
Remember that down payment amount can be done using F-47, F-48, F-54 tcodes. If it has done with ref. to PO then it will dispaly in the PO history, checkEKBE Table.
Regards,
Ajay
Probably I did not understand what you meant.
There is a price in the material through standard cost estimate already. So there is no do any MR21 for the material which I received from the customer.
Help me my understanding is correct?
I am not clear 'MR21 for the refurb. material + sales order combination'
Request you to be little more specific.
There is a price in the material master for the material which I explained above.
Sales Order level price, do you mean to enter a price in the sales order through a condition type
or do you mean condition record ????
Revathi
Normally, No duplicates because of check in REGUH. Can you check if corresponding REGUH has IDOC = blank for those 3 items ? What is your payment medium program ?
Hi, When I use program /SAPAPO/CIF_POSTPROCESS (Transaction /SAPAPO/CPP), I frequently encounter the following the message “100 postprocessing records were updated” which isn’t useful for grouping errors together for reprocessing. Does anyone know how to stop these informational messages from being displayed at the header level and have a real error message displayed instead? Thanks, Jack
I knew it was that simple, I just couldn't figure it out! Thank you Dell! <3
Matt,
I have been trying to connect to IdM server with port 50001 (by Telnet) and I get successful. So, I noticed that in this port is activated SSL, therefore I have read LH Installation Guide and there is a note that the TLS has to be activated as well.
I requested to basis team to verify it for me. Do you know if this is extremely important or just with SSL I should establish the connection?
Regards,
RG
Hi,
I have a navigational attribute in a query I want to put filter on. The value I am looking for is "Not assigned". When I do select filter value, I got all other values instead of "Not assigned" as if it does not exist. But, when I drill down on that navigational attribute I do see "Not assigned". The problem is that is just not available for filtering.
Can you please advice how to proceed further?
Hello
The best way is to use transaction CEWB. See the document CEWB - Engineering Workbench with an example.
BR
Caetano