Hi,
Thanks for your prompt responses
Do we have any specific name of DB Vendor Backup tools for Oracle Database (CMS DB)?
Thanks
Hi,
Thanks for your prompt responses
Do we have any specific name of DB Vendor Backup tools for Oracle Database (CMS DB)?
Thanks
Hi Gurus,
we have a working SAP EP system. we have a working SSO With the AD. the UME is also with the AD. in case in some pc the SSO does not work , the user can get access to the EP by using his domain credentials.
We would now like to change this so that , if the user does not get access to the EP with SSO, or the user is logged to another domain, he can get access to the EP using his backend SAP userid and password.
Can someone show me how this is done without modifying the SSO between the EP And AD ?
so basically the user database used should be SAP ABAP and the SSO should be with AD ..
Regards
Hi,
During upgrade pre processing phase i got below error:
Checks after phase MAIN_SHDIMP/SUBMOD_SHD2_RUN/RUN_RADCUCNT_ALL2 were negative!
Last error code set: Single errors (code <= 8) found in logfile 'RADCUCNTALL2.ELG'
ERROR: Batchjob RADCUCNTUPG on shadow system failed. Detected the following errors:
# /usr/sap/QTY/SUM/abap/log/RADCUCNTALL.QTY:
3 EDO551 Level "99":"4" objects assigned, "33" less dependencies
3 EDO551 Level "100":"22" objects assigned, "18" less dependencies
3 EDO551 Level "101":"15" objects assigned, "3" less dependencies
3 EDO551 Level "102":"2" objects assigned, "0" less dependencies
3 EDO653 Graph_Analysis: "91.595" objects on "102" topological levels
1EEDO538 DD sources table "YMUS~" could not be read
1EEDO538 DD sources table "VTEST11~" could not be read
1EEDO538 DD sources table "VTEST10~" could not be read
1EEDO538 DD sources table "VBLOG~" could not be read
1EEDO538 DD sources table "UTAB~" could not be read
1EEDO538 DD sources table "TERCL~" could not be read
1EEDO538 DD sources table "TERCL3~" could not be read
1EEDO538 DD sources table "TERCL2~" could not be read
1EEDO538 DD sources table "T512CLU~" could not be read.
For resolution i followed SAP Note 765475 for Unicode Conversion Troubleshooting and found
"‘Table type XXXXXX: Row type YYYYYYY does not exist. Nametab cannot be created.'
1EED: DD sources table “xxx” could not be read.
Runtime object for "TABINCSTR" could not be generated. Tabletype UMGTTABNM: Linetype UMGSTABNM does not exist. Nametab not created.
Solution: You can ignore such error messages for the following obsolete tables:
TABINCSTR, H_DC1RULES, DHISTSTR, BDLYTCC, UMGTTABNM, UMGTCPFLD, UMGTCHKP"
Please guide me more for the specified issue.
Regards,
Gaurav Rana
Hi Dharmin,
As you said Currently PO number is coming in your subject line. Please check the variable get populated to display PO number ( EKKO-EBELN ). To display the creator SAP ID you can use EKKO-ERNAM. I am not sure but if there is some way to put some logic to populate the variables used in subject line (In T-Code NACE) then based on ERNAM you can find the user name.
Also please let me know if this will not work then I can suggest one more option that will be complete custom solution.
Cheers,
Prakash
wait. no correct answer for posting the function? maybe i shouldn't have bothered to type an example? was I gamified?
Hi Siva
These are the steps in STO - inter or intra co
1. Company A is requesting company and creates inter co STO on B
2. B does PGI if stock is available or manufactures and does PGI. Acc entry is Cogs Dr and Stock Cr
3. Stock shows as stock in transit at this stage
4. B does invoicing vf01. Acc entry is Inter co Customer Dr and Sales revenue Cr. Use trading partners here
5. A receives goods and does GR. Acc entry is Stock Dr and Gr Ir Cr.
6. You can set up ERS feature to automate Miro because inter co is your trusted supplier.
ERS will automatically do miro for all open GR IRs. You can search forum on ERS. You can also do miro manually as usual
Br. Ajay M
We have a scenario where we need to maintain different supersession chains for the same Material / Part in different Plants or Sales areas. Do we have an option in standard SAP to do this ? We are using an ECC 6 SAP system with IS Auto. The transaction available to maintain the Supersession is PIC01. Here, we are able to maintain the Supersession chain at a client level alone.
Hi..
Although row material for FG or SFG have “do not cost” flag, row material’s cost is included in std cost for them.
To exclude row material with do not cost” flag, Refer to below picture.
You should define space as Indicator for Relevancy to Costing for row material with do not cost” flag Through t-code cs02.
Hi Rameez,
Are you using integrated DB which is installed with BI 4.1 or Do you have External DB as CMS DB?
Regards,
JRK PRASAD
Hi Vinaya,
Please check the cost objects which you have given in the transaction will have required profit center or not?
Given Cost object might not assigned PC and diverting the values to dummy profit center.
BR, Srinivas Salpala
Hi,
You finished your studies in 2011 and must be working since then. See which domain you are in and relate yourself with the SAP modules. This SAP Modules : What's Hot and What's Not !
is very good document and would give you best understanding.
CC: Suseelan Hari
ntn
Hi,
thanks fpr your reply. That the fixed indicator is set for the creation indicator B is okay and also intended for such documents. My problem is that the fild is read-only and i could not edit the field manually. Could somone help please.
Thanks,
Steve
Hi Rupesh,
this is nothing new but very similar to a case with EhP version for ERP where a customer always thinks should I go for EHP6 OR EHp5 now and later EhP6 etc
Answer is always the suit your need but with stability and thats why N-1 is more preferred
If there is any functionality which customer wants to go for and not available in current release...Upgrade to that level is the only Solution but there will be lot of bugs you might find out and infact delay your implementation as well and in the mean time SP11 will be out with fixing of these bugs
Solution Manager 7.1 doesn't have EhP but have FP in the SPs itself so a bit confusing but the concept is same.
If you are a bit worried and want to be on N-1 and not want SP10 immediately as per N-1
check if customer can wait for new functionality for few months like till SP11 will be launched and then perform upgrade
I hope above helps
Regards
Prakhar
Hello Naseem,
Thanks for your reply.
I confirmed with client that there is no Reconciliation account changed for these vendors 131106 & 16893.
The account type for this is 'K' vendors.
Regards,
Shekhar.
Dear All,
I am doing in development client below settings I click on new entry button revaluation of consumption filed is display mode not in
entry mode .
How to clear this problem ?
Please help any buddy.
SPRO>Controlling >Product Cost Controlling > Actual Costing/Material Ledger > Material Update > Define Movement Type Groups of Material Ledger
2) Another doubt Exch .rate Diff not update in CKMLCP .Its not showing exch .Rate diff Colum .Its updated Price Diff Colum System picked PRD gl a/c . I have mapped in OBYC ,PRD and KDM .
system takes PRD GL a/c not KDM GL a/c
Please help me .
Any Help?
Hi Hasan,
Thanks for the reply.
The FM CRM_CONFIRM_ADD_ITEM_EC is being called. But here when the routine put_to_atp is called, the IV_CONF_MODE is always set to 'C'. To get schedlin details we need to set it to 'D' and it will be set by BADI CRM_ATP_INFO_BADI.
The middleware parameters are also maintained.
The problem that i am facing is, in the FM FM CRM_CONFIRM_ADD_ITEM_EC, the BADI CRM_ATP_INFO_BADI' is called at line 314. But in my case it never reached there because the check at line 307,
IF ( lv_lookup_only = true OR lv_extinf_defined = true ), always fails.
These two variables are set at line 227 by below FM -
CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_AV_CHECK_DEFINED'
EXPORTING
iv_header_guid = iv_header_guid
IMPORTING
ev_apo_defined = lv_apo_defined
ev_r3_defined = lv_r3_defined
ev_lookup_only = lv_lookup_only
ev_extatp_defined = lv_extatp_defined
ev_extinf_defined = lv_extinf_defined
ev_apo_info_only = lv_apo_info_only.
What configuration should i maintain, am i missing something here. Why varibles lv_extinf_defined and lv_lookup_only are always false?
Please suggest.
Thanks - Mahendra
Hi Jansi
i have been reading but this is not sufficient and confusing me and that is why clarifying it with all experts..
reference base will come from where ...if there is no system
i have run with system and that is fine because reference system is ehp6 so we know we are comparing a ehp4 with 6 and then system can build analsysi
here we dont have system as a reference and knowledge base we are not providing any data so how system will know which are the SAP stanard table modules etc in new EHP6 ...because there is no system in the background
hope this clarifies where i am struck up
The data for these field can be fetched from Functional modules assigned to each field in below table:
V_TWPC_COL_ERP
Path to reach this table: SPRP/ PM / MSS (WD-ABAP) / Object and Data Provider / Data Provider / Define Columns.
Give me a screenshot for above table for the entry(Column Name): MSS_EMAIL