Re: SAP Jam Integration with Cloud For Customer error

February 27, 2014, 10:21 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Lynked to property - axis overwrite - BPC 10 NW

≪ Previous: Re: How to raise a exception if the incoming value for a source field is empty

$

0

0

JAM has two different fields UserID and Username. Not sure which one is in effect here.

Where did you change this field? Must be in your SFSF? Then, it will not get reflected in your JAM immediately. Both SFSF and JAM are two different systems integrated with a nightly data sync!

 

If you got your JAM instance as a part of SFSF, then you will have to create users in your SFSF so that they will be replicated in your JAM instance in a nightly sync!

Make sure the new users are made Active and permission are set in such a way to allow JAM Access. Let's try with a new user to avoid confusions.

 

So, create one user in SFSF today and wait till it get reflected in your JAM instance. We will then have perfect scenario to test.

 

I hope you are from INDIA. Isn't it late for bed?

---

Re: Lynked to property - axis overwrite - BPC 10 NW

February 27, 2014, 10:24 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: while a opening a webi intelligence it taking time?

≪ Previous: Re: SAP Jam Integration with Cloud For Customer error

$

0

0

Hi Nadine,

 

OK, so now you have currencies ARS and USD, and you only want to see USD? You have 3 Destination properties that decide the currencies. I assume that among these 3, at least one is ARS and at least one is USD, and that's why you see both currencies rather than just USD a sin your latest example.

 

The other thing is that in your latest example, you want to have a non-symmetrical selection of Destination and Account. I assume you are in Italy, therefore BRJ would always be international but FCO could be both international and domestic To achieve this, you could have 3 more properties in Destination, holding tax accounts instead of currency, and then let the Account too be decided by the properties in Destination.

 

Hope this helps, not sure I understand your issue fully!

 

/Cecilia

Re: while a opening a webi intelligence it taking time?

February 27, 2014, 10:25 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: ESS Leave Request Attachment Error

≪ Previous: Re: Lynked to property - axis overwrite - BPC 10 NW

$

0

0

Is it having some prompt which takes long to load? or the query itself taking long..

 

Please check in HTML editor if its faster...

 

What is the version of BOBJ you are on?

Re: ESS Leave Request Attachment Error

February 27, 2014, 10:26 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: while a opening a webi intelligence it taking time?

≪ Previous: Re: while a opening a webi intelligence it taking time?

$

0

0

its better to raise a ticket , I m not sure why its garbled, most likely archive link issue or content repository issue

Re: while a opening a webi intelligence it taking time?

February 27, 2014, 10:29 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Libro Mayor por Query Manager

≪ Previous: Re: ESS Leave Request Attachment Error

$

0

0

Hi,

 

BO 4.0 sp5 patch 7

Re: Libro Mayor por Query Manager

February 27, 2014, 10:29 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: [PERSISTENCE CLASS] CRUD for several records

≪ Previous: Re: while a opening a webi intelligence it taking time?

$

0

0

Hola, Puedes enviarme el Query completo a   saxpuac@leasing.com.gt  Saludos y Gracias

[PERSISTENCE CLASS] CRUD for several records

February 27, 2014, 10:28 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Subsistence Allowance

≪ Previous: Re: Libro Mayor por Query Manager

$

0

0

Hi Gurus !

 

I was reading several topics regarding the Persistence Class Concept and I had suddenly a question about the management of several records in the database . After few hours, I discovered that there are no generated CRUD implementations by SAP (CRUD = Method Create, Read, Update, Delete).

 

I would like to know, if I am wrong and I have to continue further my research regarding this point or, there is really no CRUD generated for several records by SAP in persistence class. So have you got any example according this concept ?

 

Many thank for sharing experience

 

Kind regards.

 

Rachid

Re: Subsistence Allowance

February 28, 2014, 10:36 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: PCo 2.3 Authorization Error while connecting to MII 14.0

≪ Previous: [PERSISTENCE CLASS] CRUD for several records

$

0

0

Thanks Yadav

 

I understood what you mentioned, but a small confusion that

 

We maintained the valuation rules for both 50% and 75%

but how the system knows that these percentages are calculate based on the basic salary.

 

can you please explain me in detailed way

 

Thanks in advance

---

Re: PCo 2.3 Authorization Error while connecting to MII 14.0

February 28, 2014, 10:36 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Structural Authorization - Restrict Single Object

≪ Previous: Re: Subsistence Allowance

$

0

0

Make sure you add the local machine name in the PCo user string for authentication, i.e. domain\user or machinename\user.

 

If you don't add it, the domain is implied, and it usually tries to authenticate with the domain controller, hence the authentication error.

Structural Authorization - Restrict Single Object

February 28, 2014, 10:36 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Some accounts in 0ACCOUNT hierarchy MD not loading from ECC

≪ Previous: Re: PCo 2.3 Authorization Error while connecting to MII 14.0

$

0

0

Hello,

Our company does not currently utilize structural authorizations across HR but we're exploring use of this functionality as a means to restrict user access to workflow agent responsibility setup via OOCU_RESP.  Standard security setup for this transaction does not provide the ability to restrict against a specific rule number.

 

My question is how to best configure this area to restrict access to a specific rule (object type AC) while not impacting other areas of HR access for the user.  Effectively I want the user to have all access provided under the delivered 'ALL' profile except when it pertains to object type AC which is restricted.

 

I have configured the profile as follows:

Seq	Plan Version	Obj Type	Obj ID	Maint
1	01	AC	90000001	X
2	**	RY		X
3	**	US		X

 

Under this setting, assigned users are only able to modify rule 90000001 in OOCU_RESP - attempts against other rules are restricted as expected.  How can I enable access for all other object types?  A brute force approach would be to repeat rows 2/3 for all other object types in the system but this does not seem practical.  What would be the best way to meet the objective?  I am a longtime SAP consultant in many areas but have not done anything in HR so this area is new to me.  Appreciate thoughts from the HR gurus out there.

Regards,

Adam

Re: Some accounts in 0ACCOUNT hierarchy MD not loading from ECC

February 28, 2014, 10:38 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Transfer order confirmation

≪ Previous: Structural Authorization - Restrict Single Object

$

0

0

Hi,

 

at ECC Side if  source team added by manual at hierarchy then it won't come into bw side.

You need to activate your hierarchy data source at bw side later try to pull data to info object.

use program - RS_TRANSTRU_ACTIVATE_ALL to activate data source.

 

one more thing at bw side, have you maintained hierarchy structure at info object level? if yes then you need to add new accounts also as per ecc.

 

Tx - RSHIER - here also we see maintained hierarchy structure related to 0ACCOUNT.

 

Thanks

Re: Transfer order confirmation

February 28, 2014, 10:38 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Subsistence Allowance

≪ Previous: Re: Some accounts in 0ACCOUNT hierarchy MD not loading from ECC

$

0

0

An user who confirm a TO stored in LTAP-QNAME field.

Re: Subsistence Allowance

February 28, 2014, 10:39 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Reg : Tcode Trace

≪ Previous: Re: Transfer order confirmation

$

0

0

Thanks Venkatesh

 

How can i formulate the dynamic action with this scenario

 

can you help me on that

 

Thanks in advance

Re: Reg : Tcode Trace

February 28, 2014, 10:40 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: CR XI Pass parameters to stored procedure but don't filter returned result set

≪ Previous: Re: Subsistence Allowance

$

0

0

Hello,

 

Try using STAD transaction.

 

It gives user log for given time duration, see below screen-shot.

 

 

 

Regards,

Sameer

Re: CR XI Pass parameters to stored procedure but don't filter returned result set

February 28, 2014, 10:40 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Logic Script - calculating Accounts with BAS()

≪ Previous: Re: Reg : Tcode Trace

$

0

0

I figured out how to make it work in ASP.NET, but thank you for your help. This has been a head-banger of a problem!

---

Re: Logic Script - calculating Accounts with BAS()

February 28, 2014, 10:40 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Transfer requirement not converted to Transfer order in Production Order

≪ Previous: Re: CR XI Pass parameters to stored procedure but don't filter returned result set

$

0

0

Just to confirm:

 

you have have some parent account P_EA3700

one of base members under P_EA3700 is A_51800020

 

you want to sum all base members under P_EA3700 except A_51800020 and write result to A_FCST_3700, AUDITTRAIL=CC, CATEGORY=Forecast_1

 

Vadim

Re: Transfer requirement not converted to Transfer order in Production Order

February 28, 2014, 10:42 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: 910 ST dynamic bin

≪ Previous: Re: Logic Script - calculating Accounts with BAS()

$

0

0

Suresh,

    TR to TO creation automatically is possible because of the object namely Production scheduling profile alone.

 

 

TR to TO creation works based on availability related factors we set in the profile.

You have not specified whether the two users were trying to release two orders for same material and whether the components were made available for first order alone.

In such a case because of component/s not available the second order would have ended up with TR alone and not TO.

 

 

Can you ask the two users to release orders for same material ensuring all components are available and see if the same problem still persists? If it does not work then it is possible that other reason/s exist.

 

 

Please elaborate on the changing of user name you made w.r.to the authorisation and observed things working as per expectations.

910 ST dynamic bin

March 1, 2014, 10:32 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Account Merge

≪ Previous: Re: Transfer requirement not converted to Transfer order in Production Order

$

0

0

Hello,

 

Could some one help me on this?

Client requirement is to get the document number as bin for storage type 910. I have done config change, check dynamic bin check box, no stock in WA-ZONE bin. But when I create TO with ref to delivery, by default TO picks destin bin as WA-ZONE and not delivery number.

 

Pls let me know if Im missing anything in config.

Account Merge

March 1, 2014, 10:34 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: MOPZ hangs up during Select Add-on Products

≪ Previous: 910 ST dynamic bin

$

0

0

Hi Experts....

 

I have one Requirement Regarding the Account merge.

 

Client Is having 2 duplicate accounts like A and B. Assume that A is the master Account and B is the source Account, when the client merge these A and B Accounts, Immediately whet ever we have the information we have in B account it Should come to A Account and B Account needs to be deleted or archive, and if we have any Opportunities Information In B Account that Opportunities Information Should come to A.

 

Please help me what steps i need to follow on this, ?? is there any CRM Technical Developer required for this?

 

Please help me as early as possible.

 

Regards

Mohammad

MOPZ hangs up during Select Add-on Products

March 1, 2014, 10:36 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: What is SAP HANA basic terms?

≪ Previous: Account Merge

$

0

0

We are using our Solution Manager 7.1 system to create maintenance transaction to upgrade to SPS10.  When the MOPZ process reaches step 2.3, the message 'Loading...' remains on-screen, essentially indefinitely.  We close the window, since the process is supposed to run in background but we return up to an hour later and the the 'Loading...' message is still on the screen with the progress indicator still spinning.  We have confirmed that the SAP-OSS and SAP-OSS-LIST-O01 RFC destinations are testing successfully.  There are no errors in the system log (SM21) or short dumps being generated.  We set the trace level on SAP-OSS destination and there are no apparent errors.  Any thoughts on where can we check to determine where the process is getting hung up?  Thanks in advance