Hi Stijn,
Have you fix it ?
We are facing the same problem, but with (BO 4.1 SP2).
Some users works fine and for others users shows the message "Cannot connect to olap source" to the same report.
Regards,
Rodrigo Silveira
Hi Stijn,
Have you fix it ?
We are facing the same problem, but with (BO 4.1 SP2).
Some users works fine and for others users shows the message "Cannot connect to olap source" to the same report.
Regards,
Rodrigo Silveira
Hi,
In the path below
IMG ==> Financial Accounting ==> Asset Accounting ==> Transactions ==> Specify How Default Asset Value Date is Determined
You should change the intracompany transfer to rule '2' (using posting date, instead of '1' manual entry).
From what I've understood, the intracompany transfer posting had 01.04.2012 as posting date. Thus, set the system to use the posting date instead of '1' Manual entry (value date).
let me know the results.
best regards,
Adriano M.
There is an functionality of follow up material for component. I would like to know if there is any similar option available for finished goods or trading materials.
I am doing procurement planning for externally procured Trading materials. Now my previous material A is being replaced by material B. Therefore all the planned independent requirement is available in system only for B. But still there is some stock available for material A. How can it be considered during MRP run for material B.
Example,
Material A:
On Hand Stock = 100
Planned Independent Req. = 0
Material B:
On Hand Stock = 300
Planned Independent Req. = 1000
In this case if we run MRP for material B, how we ask system to plan Purchase Requisitions for 600 instead of 700 for material B, considering stock of material A.
You should create a message for SAP about this. Sounds like something has gone broken in the standard code in the upgrade (assuming that there is no custom code (programming exit, etc.) done that might have an effect for the standard functionality). There might also be an OSS note for this, but at least I was not able to find anything relevant.
Regards,
Karri
hi all,
thank you for your replies.
Actually I need to show cumulative balances in the balance sheet.
i created my balance sheet using 0FI_GL_14 but when I am comparing it with F.01, it is not matching as F.01 shows cumulative balance.
So i used 0fi_gl_10 to pull the totals but its not working either.
i tried to check for few accounts but data not matching. i changed my DSO and applied note:1002272 but still no change.
please help me what could be wrong.
Hi, Ajay M
Thank you I understand. So it should be ok coping from US COD, If I set up 2 depriciation area, one for USGAP, another for JGAP.
Thank you.
Hi,
if you want the first 3 numbers from GL ACCOUNT use the LEFT function at transformation formula.
use- LEFT( 3,GL_ACCOUNT)
you want last 3 letters use RIGHT function.
use- RIGHT (3,GL_ACCOUNT).
it will help.
Thanks,
Phani.
Hi Kunaal
Usually, OIM accounts are not allowed for Non Leading Ledger postings... With EhP4 or 5, i guess, a new feature is added in GL Master whereby you can specify that a GL will be OIM for Leading Ledger and Not OIM for a Non Leading Ledger
Regards
Kavita Agarwal
Hi,
Did you check the all other remaining time dependent attributes has same values for that time interval [01.01.2013 til 02.14.2014 for first case] in master data.
If all attributes are same , I am sure system will merge tese records either activate master data or attribute change run.
Hi All,
Regarding my above mentioned post, I was thinking if it is possible to achieve this task by creating universe in IDT... To give you more background on this problem, please see the link below which I posted few days ago and found solution but that solution is not acceptable which is to maintain an extra product hierarchy in the ECC system
Can we achieve this building universe based on the BEx query
Plz see the link here SAP BW Product Hierarchy grouping solution
Regards
Hi
On your browser any proxy or firewall settings are blocking the site?
BR
SS
Thanks Kavita
I am aware of the new feature in GL master data which allows posting to specific ledger. Unfortunately the functionality does not work for GR/IR account or any account that has items posted and is open item managed.
Changing the user type to 'Technical User' solved the issue.
Regards,
Manish
Hi,
As Phani and Raman suggested you can go on with updating all required languages in RSCPINST..
But we resolved our issues by building new custom "ATTRIBUTE TYPE" data source on company code text table on ECC system, so you NO need to maintain new languages if you have it on ECC side.
This attribute type data source then can be mapped with info object text on BW side with info source help...
Both are options is feasible..its up to you to select approach based on your system settings....
Hi Amine,
Didn't try that before but there are some idea for you to reference.
I assume source_packet have a field which indicate the data type which call source_packet-dtype
1) Write SQL like this... (Notes: never try that, not sure if it will work)
Select fields
From table into internal table
Where ( source_packet-dtype = 1 and field1 = source_package-field1 and field2 = source_package-field2 )
OR ( source_packet-dtype = 2 and field1 = source_package-field1 ).
2) Try to split the source_packet into 2 itab, one contain type 1 and another contain type 2 data and then read with 2 sql and merge with appending key word, but this idea assume the record will be difference
Select fields
From table into internal table
Where field1 = itab_type1-field1
And field2 = itab_type1-field2.
Select fields
From table APPENDING internal table
Where field1 = itab_type2-field1
Regards
Bill
Thank you Jastin.
But there is no maximum lot size nor minimum lot size here but rounding value.
I guess PR is created just for each of requirement per monthly.
Is there any of way to combine these PRs to one by same date?
Thank you again.
Thanks Parankush.
What's the best approach to take with historical records if we are to create custom field for name?
My thought is to do a bulk upload to the custom name field with values from standard name field for historical records. And then hide the standard field via page customization.
Do you have better suggestions?
Hi Experts -
I am working on a client requirement dealing with t code CJ02 in SAP PS module. Customer wants some custom checks on certain fields when creating/editing WBS structure under a project. I need this validation to happen at PAI event (ENTER or SAVE)
Is there a SAP provided exit that can be leveraged for this functionality?
Please let me know. Much thanks.
Thank you,
Amit.
NO NO,
you can't confirm one work order twice only one time ....
when i confirmed with the first person and save ,i can't open this order in confirmation mode again
(( give message your order already confirmed .))