Hello Vikram,
The layout which I created are user-specific.
Is it required for the selection screen to have a default layout?
Regards,
Titiksha
Hello Vikram,
The layout which I created are user-specific.
Is it required for the selection screen to have a default layout?
Regards,
Titiksha
Hi Bhushan,
Thanks for the reply and also for providing me useful document. Actually I am referring few similar kind of documents, I will use this in addition to them.
I was been wondering to add where clauses and join conditions to the Data provider, at the time of creation or after creation, through REST API, like;
where Upper(Employee.EmpName)='Pavan'
where Emp.EmpId=Dept.EmpID
Is this possible by updating the Query Specification of a Data provider. Please suggest me if any alternate to achieve this.
Thanks in advance.
- Mahendra
I just happened to come back to this discussion thread. PFCG role SAP_BC_BMT_WFM_NWBC_END_USER has SWF_WORKPLACE and not IBO_WDA_INBOX. They might look similar but they aren't the same meaning the underlying implementation is different although both use POWL. If you plan to use IBO_WDA_INBOX you are still missing the steps on how to activate the action buttons.
This is certainly weird. Did you modify standard MB52?
I ask because a see another selection parameter called P_LVORM?
Also, can try running the report in non-hierarchical layout and share the screenshot?
Hi,
Select distribution formula as 'Object' and select the appropriate WBS at the RECN transaction. The accrual / deferral posting should work fine in this case.
Please make sure, that distribution is allowed for WBS for the contract type that you are using at SPRO->Flexible Real Estate Management (RE-FX)->Contract->Objects->Permitted Object Types per Contract Type.
Alternatively, for existing contracts, you can also set the appropriate WBS as receiver cost object at RECN->Contract Change Mode->Edit->CO Settlement Rule. For this you will have to run the settlement engine separately after you run the accrual engine. Using the transaction RECOSESNG or RECOSEVAR.
Hope this helps..
Regards,
Hardik Sharma
Hello, Hans! Thank you very much for looking into my question. I was able to solve this issue with your recommendation! Thanks again for the help!
Cheers,
Boyd
Ludek,
What I forgot to mention is we believe we did not see this behavior when we used 12.2.208. Yet in 12.2.208 we had a very similar issue with PDF (PDF was much larger than it is now with 12.2.214 or 12.2.217)). So any chance of this getting fixed in a newer version of CRJ? This clearly looks to be a bug.
I do not agree with it at all!
System is behaving as it should. New dates are necessarily new lines. For the same date you will have the replacement behaviour.
If you set the update period to something larger, like month, the values will be replaced also inside the month line.
You could use an info structure without period, or using always the same period. The result would be in this cases what you expect, except you would lose the Reqd Del Date information.
This could be solved with some code in the info structure update rules.
regards,
Edgar
Hi
can you please check if the GL account (to which it is configured to post) has the the check box active for "account managed in ext system"
it will be in the control data tab
Thanks
-N
I am using it in my user status profile.
Hi Shane,
In depot system will not fetch any rate it will pass on the value of excise duties from J1IJ to VF01 based on the formula 356 that you assign to excise duty condition types in the depot pricing procedure.
Normally we will capture the values into RG23D register at depot while incoming goods receipt through J1IG & we will pass on the same while selling through J1IJ.
If there is any change in price on the same excise invoice which you have already captured in the system then you will follow the process of "A" certificate.
regards,
S.Himavanth.
Hi Balaji
have add the Basic salary wagetype in your form PE51-->your form name-->Window-->W1
PE51-->your form name-->Cumulation IDs-->Earnings
Ya este lo contestamos
Guys, I got this working. We have to use FieldObject class and embed the summary field's primary detail to FieldObject. We can format FieldObject as we want. So no need to explore anymore. :)
Is Business Transaction for cancelling TECO makes the user status into REL while cancelling Confirmation??
Instead of giving short reply, give the complete details what exactly you are looking for.
thanks
but in SAP scenario it was written C in purchase order (for sales order)
It's based on the time zone you define in your general preferences: http://scn.sap.com/user-preferences!input.jspa
Dear Thomson--not only seeking help--it is also your duty to update the members who helped you in this.
Phanikumar
Please see PAM here http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/507d3365-009b-3010-04b0-e5abc8f00c91?QuickLink=index&… page 4 where it says IE11 is only supported as of BI4.1 SP03