Hi..
Temporarily, you deactiviate problem internal order’s availiability control using t-code KO32.
After solving your issue, you activitate internal order’s availiability control using t-code
KO30.
Hi..
Temporarily, you deactiviate problem internal order’s availiability control using t-code KO32.
After solving your issue, you activitate internal order’s availiability control using t-code
KO30.
Hi Praveen,
You need to have the Open PO count in your report. Is that what is required here.
If yes ,then first create an CKF to get the document count using exception aggregation.Then using this you can create an RKF also including delivery status indicator.
For doing this you need to have document number and delivery status in the cube .You can mark it as line item dimension to avoid any performance issues.
hope it helps.
thanks
Hello,
I can see that in the servlet you are trying to bind something in the naming context.
This is not allowed as per specification:
"
Java™ Platform, Enterprise Edition (Java EE) Specification, v6
EE.5.3.4Java EE Product Provider’s Responsibilities
The container must ensure that the application component instances have only read access to their naming context. The container must throw the javax.naming.OperationNotSupportedException from all the methods of the javax.naming.Context interface that modify the environment naming context and its subcontexts.
"
You should use env-entry elements in the deployment descriptor as per "EE.5.4.1.3Declaration of Simple Environment Entries" for example.
Regards
Violeta
In A/R Invoice,
Add First row with Qty-300 & linetotal-1000
Add Second row with Qty-30 & Price-0
In 'Discount' Field At row level Add 20% Discount
Note:-
Adding qty with Zero price will affect your inventory cost dependin upon your valuation method.
regards,
Raviraj
Hi Sand Buddies,
If you are trying to change an import parameter structure then SAP will throw a run time error. But if the import parameter has 'PASS VALUE' check box ticked, then you will be able to modify the structure.
Reason behind this: PASS VALUE check will copy the import parameter values in to the structure name and hence you will be able to change it where as if you are directly trying to modify the structure ,then you are trying to modify at the reference of structure which is not allowed.
Hi Srinivas,
I could see that you have cleared the refund document with a credit part of a reset clearing document.
You will not be able to do anything with the reset clearing document in your scenario.
Instead try to reverse the refund document through transaction FP08.
I don't think, it will allow you to reverse it straight away, as it is cleared.
However, if it gives you the option of reset all and post-reversal , then use that option to reverse the refund document.
This will reverse the RF document and open the RS cleared document.
Now, you can post a RF document manually with the same main\sub so that the GL entries are not effected.
If FP08 is not allowing you reverse, then the only option left is to create the original payable against the contract account.
Hope it helps...
Thanks,
Amlan
Hi Sharat,
The link is very useful.
Do we have in PP any report which lists all the back orders (production orders) as on today as like V.15?
Hi experts,
Last week, I rent an SUP server instance on Cloudshare and I developed several Mobile Business Objects.
Because that the Sybase Unwired Workspace is installed on the server, I have to develop via remote desktop connection. And, the remote desktop connection is very slow.
Today, I installed the Sybase Unwired Workspace on my local laptop and I want to develop a new app, The new app requires an existing MBO on the SUP server.
Could you tell me how to import the MBO to my local Sybase Unwired Workspace?
Please note that I cannot re-create the MBO from my local laptop because (1) the MBO uses the Sybase sample database as the data source, and (2) I cannot connect to the sample database from my local laptop.
I studied an SUP book. The book said that the MBO is a re-usable data model. However, the book did not mention how to re-use the MBO.
Please help. If you need more details about my problem, please reply.
Thanks a lot.
Hi,
Constant Selection has to be applied for the KFs only by based on a characteristic. That's why i suggested that. I feel you are doing something wrong. Your data is not complicated. Constant Selection should work. Have you followed this doc?
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-11298
Regards,
Suman
Hi Smitha,
Thanks for valuable requirement explanation. I am also trying as you guided to add a EC in the Customer XBO but i am unable to add that.
Kindly please attach a detailed way of adding the EC to the Standard screens. I even searched for the documentation but no luck couldn't got success in following the procedure. Kindly look into my request and please provide a Document with detailed steps of your solution. How you achieved this. It would be a great help for me to do this
Regards..
Hanu K
Hi Nicole,
when i am creating user with FM -HRRCF_MDL_REG_NAMED_USR_CREATE
I was entered all the mandatory parameters when i am excuting the FM getting bellow error
E HRRCF0002 017 First confirm acceptance of our data privacy statement.
Thanks,
Syam
I'm not aware of any Oralce equivalent to SQL Profiler.
Please try posting to the Oracle forum to see if they know any tools.
-Abhilash
Hello
Please provide all the indexes present in the tables.
Check whether the table FPLAYOUTT is active - Tx SE11
If the table is not active or partially active then try to activate it from SE11
If the activation fails then provide the complete log.
Also list can you check the ABAP dump when the activation fails.
Regards
RB
Hi Prashanth Konda,
I have the your error.
Could you share with me how your basic team sovle this error.
Thank you so much for your help.
Sincerely,
Minh Khoa
Hi,
Do you have light freamework page.
If yes please check the below note.
Note 1894433 - Light framework page DTN is not aligned in chrome or safari
Do you have BI installed on the portal.
If yes. What is the patch level.they should be greater than NW 7.31 SP05 Patch 20 or SP07.
And if it is webdynpro screen please check the below note.
Hope this helps.
For IE 9 please share the screen shot and the details about the iview and the patch level of your system.
Thanks
Rishi Abrol
Can you post what is the formula and error that you are getting. May be it would give a better idea to give alternatives.
Cheers!!
Durga
Create the BRF+ rule to update the BEGDA for the HR action. You also need to add "delete" action to the request type (in SPRO-->GRC-->User Provisioning-->Define Request Type) that will be using the HR trigger because the request needs to "delete" the value for the field and then update it with the future date. I implemented this for HR terminations and it was quite tricky. Don't forget to map the BRF+ function ID to the AC Application Mapping in SPRO as well.
Hi Mani,
Thanks for your response.We have initiated to implement the SAP Note 1481743.
Post implementing the Note,we will try again and let you know the status of Issue.
Thanks a lot.
Surajit
Hi Sebastian,
With the second modification it works perfectly. Thank you for your help.
Regards,
Wayne
Hi Tanmay,
There is no issue with your business process to reverse and correct profile values. Please see my list of steps below for further information.
1) You have profile values, valid values. These will have a status of IU012. No problem here.
2) When you bill them they will be locked down (i.e. you cannot change them). No problem here either. The values at this point do not have a protected status.
3) From here, profile values can be protected in two ways. When I mean protected, I mean have a protected status (IU018) applied to them.
- Either via the mass change in dialog in EEDM01, check the version history please if someone has done this manually. This can happen if the profile values are billed.
- Or if the profile values have been exported using one of the two BAPIs
(BAPI_ISUPROFILE_GET or BAPI_ISUPROFILE_GET_POD) where the status update flag has been ticked. As above, this is allowable if the profile values have been billed
4) At this point your profile values will have a status of IU012 and IU018. This is completely normal.
5) When you go to reverse your billing, the protected status is NOT removed automatically. This is also normal. This is where you need to follow the instructions in my first post by using the mass change to 'Undo Value Protection'.
6) Barring any of the above, I suggest you check to see if you have made any enhancements (i.e. implicits, BADIs, user exits) to the standard IS-U-EDM logic and process that would prevent you from doing any of the above. Of which you may need to look into this further
Regards
Zane
Message was edited by: Zane Khan