Hello Wolfgang,
Are you trying to connect to data sources other than HANA? It sounds like from the SAP Help, page 9, this is not possible: https://websmp101.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/012002523100014716232015E/ds_15SP02_admin_hana_en.pdf
Hello Wolfgang,
Are you trying to connect to data sources other than HANA? It sounds like from the SAP Help, page 9, this is not possible: https://websmp101.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/012002523100014716232015E/ds_15SP02_admin_hana_en.pdf
for specific user doesn't help;
it is the PO type that needs to be limited, not the user.....
it is a PO that we use for specific process and we do not want it to create an inforecord with the PO price
Hey guys... Thank you for your help on my previous issues, now I got a little confused with Creating an RFC Destination for SAP Gateway Hub to SAP System. I follow this post
But I got confused in which system I have to do this? Backend or frontend - and which system has to be as destination.
I have already created trust relationship between back-end (NOE) and front-end (FID) systems, but with this next step I got confused....
In hopes for answers...
Diana
Hello Blue L, I can't understand what are you saying when you compare fiori with basis.
I mean, Basis is one thing, and Fiori (for me) is totally different.
And about mobile tecnology you've got more info here: SAP Mobile or SAP for Mobile but as I said before, I don't know how you refer this with BASIS module. For me, Basis is SAP NetWeaver Technology Platform.
Can you say more about this?
Thanks.
Have you tested:
"And in your called script add the line in the beginning:
*XDIM_MEMBERSET=%ENTITY_SET%"?
Hi ,
I am sending sales order from C4C to ECC via HCI.
After deploying artifact Request External Data from SAP Business Suite ,IT_ORDER_EXTENSIONS segment is not created in target payload.
The same scenario is replicated using " SAP Process Integration " as middle ware and the IT_ORDER_EXTENSIONS segment is created in target payload.
Your help is much appreciated.
Thank you.
Raghuram.J
I agree. It looks like you could wrap the page in an app too.
<App>
<pages>
<Page>
...
I'll contact the template team for clarification.
Regards,
Jamie
SAP - Technology RIG
Mukthar,
Thank you for this information. This transaction code does provide the needed information when I am looking at a specific date and variant.
Sincerely,
Upon checking, creating synonym for a synonym is not supported by SAP HANA, therefore we had to remove the existing synonym. My error happened because it is creating synonym for the synonym.
1. Check if the synonym belongs to schema or shadow instance schema.
select * from synonyms where synonym_name='<synonym_name>'; (the synonym SUM is trying to create)
2. Check if the table exists.
select table_name from m_cs_tables where schema_name = '<schema_name>' and table_name='synonym_name'
3. If the table DOES NOT exist from above query, it should be created.
3.1 Drop the synonym. Make sure it is really a synonym, not the actual table. (you can check the column "OBJECT_NAME" for the table it is referring to)
drop synonym "<SCHEMA>"."<SYNONYM_NAME>"
3.2 Create the table (use the synonym name) in SE14.
Repeat the phase.
hay te deje la imagen con la cantidad pendiente
Hi need information regarding SAP certification exam in Europe. Can I anyone guide me the procedure for exam registration? In Europe, how I create my S-user ID if want to give certification exam with Pearson Vue? Thanks
Hi,
We're planning an heterogeneous copy from Data Integration 11.7 on Windows/Oracle to Data Services 4.2 on Windows/SQLServer. We've readed on Best Practices for upgrading older Data Integrator or Data Services repositories to Data Services 4.2 - Enterprise Infor… that it's possible to create a copy of actual repository on to local repository and thus, connect this to a Data Services for doing the jobs upgrade. (Option 3)
Can we create this new local repository pointing to a SQL Server instance? Any experience about this kind of migration?
Many thanks!
Hello QM Experts,
I am an SD consultant and need an urgent help on a QM issue . Your valuable inputs is needed in order to go ahead with our UAT testing.
Scenario : We are dong a subcontracting scenario where we drop ship the material from supplier end to the end customer . In this process we initially do a GR at our plant for the sample lot before asking the supplier to use the same lot to ship to the customer based on the inspection results. The warehouse team record these results against the lot number for that material.
Issue : when warehouse does a virtual GR for the actual shipment and trying to record the results the system is again proposing a new lot number Ideally the system is not expected to create a new lot since the actual GR was done against the samples and QM results recorded.
Current inspection set up in the material master data : ( Z01 ( Inspection of GR on a PO & Z02 - Inspection for Production order) ).
I would like to know what setting is needed to stop the system from creating a new inspection lot while recording the inspection results doing a virtual GR . Please help me out here.
Thanks
Sai
Or any other Industry type on a ECC6 EHP5 system that was originally installed as 4.6c and upgraded a couple times. We have a good handle on the enhancements but need to verify any Industry types.
Thank you in advance for what I suspect is simple question for the right person
A safer way to do this might be to modify this screen to call a popup where you add the new serial numbers (in 30 characters) and then format them to 18 characters when the user goes back.
Rob
Hari,
Can you check the sample Worklfows, WS21000076 and WS21000075.
Thanks,
Amlan
I have tried this, it doesn't work either
No luck
Any help?
Thank you
Just what i thought i just wanted to make sure there wasn't another "easier" way to do it, thanks for your quick responses Juwin.
Mike fields