Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all 8902 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Asset Revaluation using separate depreciation area

$
0
0

Hi Atif,

 

No need to create a separate dep.area for revaluation. Once you do revaluation posting, the system will post the entry to depreciation exp and dep.reserve. Based on base method 03 maintained in multi level method, the system will consider revaluations also.

 

Regards,
Mukthar


Re: Issues with BPC Consolidation Monitor in BPC 10.1 embedded Model

$
0
0

Hi Ursula,

 

Thanks for reply.

 

I have also opened incident with SAP and following on that.

 

I am on BW7.4 SP14 and BPC 10.1 SP010.

 

Regards,

Sarvesh

Individual print out from IW38/IW39 in sap pm

$
0
0

Hi sir,

i have a quarryabout print from iw38/iw39 . Question is client is getting multiple orders print from IW38/IW39, But the requirement is they want output print as order wise. that means each order must be print on a anew page.how can we solve this.Waiting for your valuable reply.

 

could please reply on this.

Re: Restrit Users through XSODATA

$
0
0

is there a solution by creating hdbprocedure and then calling in xsodata? If yes, then pls give some idea on coding

Re: Error in HTTP Connection Test(SM59) for Web Service Consumption

Re: Restrit Users through XSODATA

$
0
0

Please check the above solution. I have not worked on this scenario and hence cannot advise other way.

 

BR.

Goal upload from legacy to SF PMGM

$
0
0

Hi,

 

1. Is it possible to upload goals from legacy system to SF PMGM - to my knowledge it is possible...via Import/Export Goals library...we can design the goal template in SF according to the current goal library in legacy and then upload it in SF) please confirm my understanding

 

2. Is it possible to upload goals from legacy system to SF employee wise...different employees will have different goals plans so is it possible to upload to SF employee wise...(in the template there is no option for User Name)

 

 

Thanks,

Sriram

Re: Solution Manager installation stuck in "Prapare to install minimal configuration"

$
0
0

Update:

 

The problem is resolved.It was trying to access SystemProperties available in ConfigTool.

 

- Tried login to ConfigTool and it was not getting connected to DB.

 

Solution:

 

Cleared archive logs from "oraarch" directory and after that within two minutes, installation precess got completed.

 

Best regards,

SUJIT


Re: how to assign unique id to xml view if we use router

$
0
0

Where you want to access ??

 

If its in controller of same view then you need not declare self=this.

Simply in the onInit() method do as -

 

this._control1 = this.getView().byId("controlId");

 

Then this._control1 will have reference to the control and you use it as you like.

 

BR.

Re: Error with respect to Component BC-XI-IBD

$
0
0

I've same situation with you.

No solution now.

Ayuda en ALV Grid

$
0
0

Hola, buenas noches. Estoy haciendo un reporte ALV en el que entre otras cosas se muestra la diferencia de días desde cuando se crea, asigna (primera aprobación) y las diferentes aprobaciones que ha tenido una solicitud (rev-trac).

Cuando se hace el cálculo para una sola solicitud no hay problema alguno. La diferencia que se hace entre fecha de creación y primera aprobación está bien; así como entre fecha de aprobación conforme va ejecutándose el loop.

El problema se da cuando se tiene más de una solicitud ya que en vez de validarse fecha de creación y fecha de aprobación de la solicitud actual está tomando la fecha de aprobación anterior que corresponde a la solicitud anterior (imagen). Más sin embargo, la segunda posición de la solicitud actual (en el ejemplo sería la 379) hace el cálculo de días con la fecha anterior y así sucesivamente hasta que termina de forma correcta.

Este problema que menciono solo lo tengo cuando amplio el rango desde la desde la pantalla de selección así como para la primera posición de una segunda, tercera, ..., solicitud (rev-trac). Si solo hay una solicitud, no hay problema.

 

<<Destaco que mis datos ya están ordenados por lo cual sé que el orden presente es el correcto; mismo que lo hago en un FORM anterior.>>

 

Hasta ahora mi código y lo último agregado:

 

*---------------------------------------------------------------------*

FORM imprime_datos .

 

*  Declaración de variables locales.

  DATA: lv_date_last    TYPE sy-datum,  "Última fecha

        lv_date_current TYPE sy-datum,  "Fecha actual

        lv_index   TYPE i.       

 

*  Inicio modif. 06.05.2016.

  DATA: lv_rt_current TYPE zreq,

        lv_rt_last    TYPE zreq,

        lv_flag       TYPE i.

*  Fin modif. 06.05.2016.

 

  LOOP AT lt_app.

    lv_index = sy-tabix.   

    lv_flag  = sy-tabix.    "Add 06.05.2016

   

  CLEAR lv_diff.         

 

*   Lectura de datos por solicitud.

    READ TABLE lt_req WITH KEY request = lt_app-request.

 

    SELECT SINGLE texto

      FROM zstapp

      INTO lv_txtst

      WHERE status EQ lt_app-status.

 

    IF sy-subrc EQ 0.

      lt_out-txtst = lv_txtst.

    ENDIF.

 

    IF sy-subrc = 0.

*   Validación de la primera fecha.

      IF lv_index = 1.

        lv_date_last = lt_req-cdate.

      ENDIF.

      CLEAR lv_index.

 

* Inicio modif. 06.05.2016

      IF lv_flag = 1.

        lv_date_current = lv_date_last.

        CLEAR lv_flag.

      ENDIF.

* Fin modif. 06.05.2016.

    ENDIF.

 

    CLEAR: lv_date_current.

    lv_date_current = lt_app-mdate.

 

*  Diferencia de días entre status.

    CALL FUNCTION 'DAYS_BETWEEN_TWO_DATES'

      EXPORTING

        i_datum_bis = lv_date_current

        i_datum_von = lv_date_last    "Aprobación.

      IMPORTING

        e_tage      = lv_diff.

 

    IF sy-subrc EQ 0.

      lt_out-diasdif = lv_diff.

    ENDIF.

 

*  Inicio modif. 06.05.2016.

    lv_rt_current = lt_app-request.

    IF lv_rt_current NE lv_rt_last.

      lv_flag = 0.

    ENDIF.

 

    lv_rt_last = lt_app-request.

 

*  Fin modif. 06.05.2016.

 

*   Traspaso de registros en tablas.

    MOVE-CORRESPONDING lt_req TO lt_out.

    MOVE-CORRESPONDING lt_app TO lt_out.

 

*   Agregar registros.

    APPEND lt_out.

 

    lv_date_last = lv_date_current.

 

  ENDLOOP.

ENDFORM.                    " IMPRIME_DATOS

*---------------------------------------------------------------------*

 

Podrían orientarme de favor.

De antemano gracias.

 

 

Saludos.

Re: date conversion to dd/mm/yyyy format

Re: Model Transport from IBP-Starter Edition

$
0
0

Hello Diwakar

 

You need to request the SAP Cloud Ops team to setup the transport route between the source and target system.

 

Regards.

YS

Re: Target directory '/usr/sap/XQ1/DVEBMGS01/j2ee/cluster/server0/\\ADMIN-PC\TaxInvoice' does not exist.

$
0
0

Hi Rajesh,

 

Did you select create target directory option in the receiver file communication channel?

 

Also check whether the user [Which you are using in the communication channel] have sufficient authorization's to access the directory.

 

Regards

Bhargava Krishna

Re: AI_SC_REFRESH_READ_ONLY_DATA error: Error during call of SAP back end system (see long text)


Re: Disable ITM_TYPE field at shopping cart item level

$
0
0

Dear all,

 

We are facing a similar issue with Item Category in a contract document. This field is available for changes in Quality environment, but unavailable in Productive and Development environment.

 

We would need to check the main root of the differences and where can be checked.


Any idea would be really appreciated!


Kind Regards!


Raúl

Cost collector deleting flag

$
0
0

Dear expert,

Beside set deleting flag to Cost collector,

is there any other standard method to let Product cost collector not involved in the CPTD/CO43/KKS5/CO88 processing?

Re: Data data at aggregate Level (time dimension perspective) in IBP 6.1

$
0
0

Hi Achal,

 

Please see chapter 17.1 for the modelling concept required in order to disaggregate across time periods: http://help.sap.com/download/ibp/ibp61_model_conf.pdf

 

Depending on the granularity of your time profile, you can generate the time profile automatically via the application job or create it manually. The automatized one will not populate the period weighting factors which is needed for week to month disaggregation.

 

What I would recommend you, just to test the modelling and understand it, would be to create a new TP: M-Q-Y (Monthly = base level, Quarterly = 1, Yearly =2) and use the application job to auto-generate data for this time profile. Once the application job finished, check the data integration tab and you will see the corresponding log. Then create a very small planning area and assign the time profile.

You will see that loading on Quarterly / Yearly will work just fine.

 

Regards

Alecsandra

Re: Production of multiple finished products from Single Prod Order

$
0
0

Hi Dick,

 

Apart from what Frank Wang has suggest, There is no other way to produce more than 1 FG from 1 PO.

 

Thanks,

Harshal

Re: IT0014 Issue

$
0
0

Hello Sankarsan

 

I have nearly 300 wage types in IT0014, i don't think it is possible to change the PCL47 for all.

 

Is there any other way to fix this without changing PCl47

 

 

 

Reg

Kumar

Viewing all 8902 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596344.js" async> </script>